When it comes to managing product risk, many businesses assume their liability policy will provide all the protection they need. But when a recall happens, the true difference between a standalone product recall policy and a simple product recall expenses extension quickly becomes clear, as unfortunately a few companies have become experienced due to a lack of advice.
Why Recalls Matter
In today’s regulatory and consumer environment, product recalls are becoming more frequent and more costly. Whether caused by contamination, mislabeling, or safety defects, the financial and reputational consequences can be severe. Direct costs are only part of the challenge — businesses must also deal with lost sales, damaged relationships, and a hit to brand reputation.
Two Options for Coverage
Product Recall Expenses Extension
This is an endorsement that can be added to a standard product liability policy. It typically provides basic protection for the immediate logistics of a recall, such as:
- Transport, storage, and destruction of defective products
- Notification of regulators and customers
However, it comes with important limitations. These extensions usually do not cover loss of profits, replacement stock, crisis management, or the financial losses of third parties. Limits are often modest — sometimes only $100,000 to $1 million. For businesses facing large-scale recalls, this cover can leave significant gaps.
Standalone Product Recall Insurance
A standalone policy is designed to respond comprehensively to recall events. In addition to the direct costs above, it may also cover:
- Business interruption and loss of gross profit
- Cost of re-manufacturing and redistributing stock
- Third-party financial losses (e.g., retailers or distributors)
- Crisis management consultants and PR support
- Brand rehabilitation campaigns
Limits are higher and can be tailored to the business risk profile, making this option suitable for industries with high exposure such as food & beverage, pharmaceuticals, automotive, and consumer goods.
A Real-Life Example
Imagine you’re a food manufacturer. A batch of frozen meals is contaminated with undeclared allergens. Suddenly, 200,000 units across the country need to be recalled.
- With just an extension, you’d get help collecting and destroying the meals — but you’d be on your own for lost profits, retailer claims, and brand damage.
- With a standalone policy, you’d also get financial support for new stock, crisis management consultants, and a brand recovery campaign.
One protects your balance sheet. The other protects your whole business.
If your business faces high recall risks, it’s worth asking: do you just want cover for the basics — or for the survival of your brand?
How Much Insurance Should Food Companies Buy?
This is one of the most common questions and the answer depends on a mix of risk exposure, supply chain relationships, and financial resilience. There’s no “one-size-fits-all” answer, but we find that most people do not purchase the worst case scenario limits. Here’s how we usually think about it:
Factors That Influence the Right Limit
- Revenue / Turnover: Larger companies (>$100m turnover) generally need much higher limits to match their exposure.
- Distribution Scale: National or international distribution increases recall costs dramatically compared to local-only businesses.
- Retailer Contracts: Many major supermarkets (e.g., Coles, Woolworths) expect suppliers to hold recall cover — they do not specify limits like general liability.
- Facilities: Understanding the products manufactured at what facilities, on how many production lines and what batch sizes.
- Regulatory Environment: FSANZ and global allergen/labelling standards mean even minor errors can trigger expensive recalls.
- Supply Chain Complexity: If your product is an ingredient in someone else’s food, a recall could escalate into multi-party claims.
- Brand Sensitivity: Premium or well-known consumer brands face higher reputational exposure, so higher limits are prudent.
Benchmarking Rule of Thumb
Work with your client to run recall modelling (scenario planning). This helps estimate realistic recall costs for your product portfolio. But in short:
- Small food and beverage companies: $1m–$5m
- Medium: $10m–$20m
- Large/national/export brands: $30m–$50m+
Reassess limits regularly — turnover, distribution, and retailer demands change over time.
The right limit is ultimately about protecting your business from a recall event that could otherwise threaten its survival. It could be as bad as having a fire that destroy’ s your facility.
For more information and enquiries, please contact us.
Recent Comments